The Learner
The Learner

I accidentally watched this again and read my own comment and thought before I noticed it was my comment how amazing a comment it was.

13 daqiqa oldin
Theo Megawerty
Theo Megawerty

The real magic is holding the notion that Consciousness is an emergent property of matter.

17 daqiqa oldin
Miguel Sanchez
Miguel Sanchez

When time is viewed as a measurement, not a dimension the two can be reconciled.

19 daqiqa oldin
Jesse Montano
Jesse Montano

This is fully psychedelic!!! Right on

34 daqiqa oldin
1969nitsuga
1969nitsuga

There is no evidence of a round earth. Only cgi, paintings and fisheye pictures from low earth semi orbits. You don't see anything with a radio telescope but electromagnetic signals.

Soat oldin
ADANTHEGIANT
ADANTHEGIANT

how many angels can stand on the head of the pin? answer: who gives a fukc!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2 soat oldin
Управляющая компания ТОР Групп
Управляющая компания ТОР Групп

Man ! the subject is so interesting,but you are so boring - with all do respect - hire somebody else.

2 soat oldin
Stanislaw Stefanow
Stanislaw Stefanow

What if humanity was bioengineered by a another advanced race as a grand sociological experiment?

3 soat oldin
Christopher Avery
Christopher Avery

Our universe was like a bag of chips. It was perfect, wrapped up nice. Sealed and balanced. But then two great attractors ripped open the bag. Cheeto bag universe theory

3 soat oldin
Inayat Mauj
Inayat Mauj

i want to cry now, thanks.

3 soat oldin
N1otAn1otherN1ame
N1otAn1otherN1ame

11% of Earth's gravity and no magnetic field. Sunshine, lollipops and rainbows, for sure!

3 soat oldin
alex Lo
alex Lo

They present mass with no mass particles running in confine space under Higg fields. I think this's all his saying.

4 soat oldin
U-tube editoR
U-tube editoR

[the Phone Booth {at the} Revival Library]

4 soat oldin
JO AZZ
JO AZZ

You’re explanations are too confusing . You should inspire from Arvin Ash’s channel

4 soat oldin
Glen Allan
Glen Allan

What if the star doesn’t collapse below the event horizon? Does it have to?

4 soat oldin
Glen Allan
Glen Allan

“Belief should wait for the evidence” ... But the thing is, when you have the evidence, belief is no longer necessary. This is a problem with the word. I think it’s better to say one is ‘convinced’ than that one has belief. And that to believe is not “belief” where evidence is concerned. Perhaps we need better words to help eliminate these things from being conflated, otherwise faith tends to creep in.

4 soat oldin
RumpelForceKin
RumpelForceKin

I've always thought magnetics are the key to this kind of machine

4 soat oldin
RumpelForceKin
RumpelForceKin

I feel like the key to this machine is macro, gravity plus magnetism

4 soat oldin
•R•C•S•
•R•C•S•

Sheldon

5 soat oldin
John Manderson
John Manderson

Ask Sir Dyson to help solve the vacuum catastrophe ☺️

5 soat oldin
Chris Davison
Chris Davison

Really surprised to see you repeating 23 and me's BS, after all those twins got different results from the same companies. They really are not exact as they claim. I wouldn't trust important health decisions on such random results.

5 soat oldin
Dan P
Dan P

Why is his head so disproportionately big compared to his body? ( I ask this as a person whose forehead is the size of an airfield, or so I've been told)

5 soat oldin
Lekgolo137
Lekgolo137

I don't know much about qm, but wave functions sound like bullshit, there's no superposition of states, just ignorance of them.

5 soat oldin
Nigel Griffiths
Nigel Griffiths

General relativity just prove the point that if we can travel at the speed of light time travel is possible. Is that right. Because general relativity, through the time travel forward. Is possible . what about time travel backwards. That's the big thing isn't it. We know we can go forward but can we go backwards general relativity says as in that zone travelling at the speed of light we do not age. We could just be 100 years away from time travel to be able to time travel we must be a space going species. At the moment we're not really quite there but even if you Elon Moss gets to the red planet . give them 100 years things could be completely different. Then in the realms of 100 years after we have become a space going specie in our own solar system things would seem more possible so I say time travel could be possible we know it's possible Ford but it could be possible back when we make the jump of light I'm just a farmer this is really fascinating stuff great video loved it keep making more

5 soat oldin
Michael Diamreyan
Michael Diamreyan

RIP freeman Dyson

5 soat oldin
mush730
mush730

*Layman question: Dark energy is described to be a force that empty space still holds (which in fact is theorized to accelerate the universe's expansion)- But isn't part of that energy dependent on the tension that an empty space has vis-a-vis matter (that holds mass and gravitational force) around it? If matter suddenly disappeared (like it will gradually happen as the universe ages), would it not diminish from the force of dark energy?

5 soat oldin
chris johnson
chris johnson

Why you fast talking??? Is it too make sure no one will understand you correctly and find out you are talking nothing but rubbish lies?

6 soat oldin
chris johnson
chris johnson

GRAVITY AND REALVILITY ARE PHONY EXCUSES TO EXPLAIN THE CRAZY SH!T ON THE GLOBE.

6 soat oldin
Alan formula1
Alan formula1

I would give anything to be around when or if we find other life. It would change everything

6 soat oldin
Bogdan Majkic
Bogdan Majkic

This is all wrong!

6 soat oldin
Daniel Jones
Daniel Jones

Blah, blah, blah, conformal space, blah, blah, blah, quantum mechanics , blah, blah, blah

6 soat oldin
Ege Özmeral
Ege Özmeral

Conservation of Information is NOT about TIME-REVERSAL SYMMETRY BUT REVERSABILITY, which is a hole different concept. Time-reversal symmetry means if you time were going backwards, the laws of physics remain the same, however, the reversability is that once you know the final state of a system, you can compute its initial state uniquely. In the case of black hole evaporations, you cannot compute the state of objects in the black hole from the radiation itself, therefore, the black hole evaporation is an irreversible process which contradicts quantum mechanics.

6 soat oldin
Kay jay
Kay jay

No one can even go near venus the temperature is too hot it will melt you alive.

6 soat oldin
immigrant george
immigrant george

I know exactly what the next breakthrough in science will be and where it will come from. It has already started. There is a book on Amazon titled - My Quest to Understand EVERYTHING: Everything is the Mechanics of Reflection. On its cover there is the true pattern of the Magnetic field. And it has nothing to do with the one shown in textbooks. And there is the proof for it. Also, the book explains the origins of Universe/Existence. It answers not the question how, but why... why there is anything rather than nothing... Also you will find answers in this book to what is Space and time, what are black holes, what is dark Matter and Dark energy... Among other things it explains why flat Earth theory is insane and impossible but the hollow Earth is absolutely possible within existing laws of physics and some experiments confirm that. Also, what is free will and what is Truth. And many, many other things are there... happy reading! Challenge yourself. The book proves that Big Bang and god creator are both absolutely impossible.

6 soat oldin
Elvis Sanchez
Elvis Sanchez

I don't do drugs... I watch these kind of videos... They make my head spin harder than any mind altering substances.

6 soat oldin
Duncan Kelly
Duncan Kelly

And there is absolutely NO scientific evidence for it.

6 soat oldin
Duncan Kelly
Duncan Kelly

The first Law of Thermodynamics is matter can not be created nor destroyed. It only changes form. ergo The Big Bang is ludicrous.

6 soat oldin
Churlz
Churlz

White holes > Black holes.

6 soat oldin
P M
P M

It starts with decoherence but ends with the multiuniverses. Even God was not able to count them. Decoherence is a simple conclusion of interference. However it seems to be rather idea emerged from laboratory efforts. Not nice enough. Also because a sensor really may affect a wavefunction more than just destroying their coherence 9:10 - 9:30. / Rgs P.Marciniak

6 soat oldin
Duncan Kelly
Duncan Kelly

My thinking on this issue is when you have to remove videos so other people can't view them you are hiding something. Clearly. If you think an idea is stupid normally the more people that see it and understand it the better. Correct? So why hide the flat earth videos? Let people make up their own minds. The fact that UZmemory and Google went to such an extreme is very telling.

7 soat oldin
John Capstan
John Capstan

If many-worlds quantum mechanics is true then our present birth rank n is associated with many actually-occurring futures with all final population sizes N. In such a scenario the prior probability of finding ourselves at rank n is P(n)= Sum[N=n to infinity] P(n|N) * P(N). According to the Self-sampling assumption applied to each future P(n|N) = 1/N. We can also take the prior probability weight for the final population sizes N to be P(N) = 1/N. This distribution has no length scale and so represents complete prior ignorance of some positive number N. Thus if we approximate the sum with an integral we find P(n)=Int[N=n to infinity] (1/N)(1/N) = 1/n. Thus the prior probability P(n)=1/n of our rank n does not depend on any particular final population size N. Therefore measurement of our rank n does not give us any knowledge about the final population size that we would experience if we lived long enough to see the end of our version of the human race.

7 soat oldin
Crystal Butler
Crystal Butler

Nah I think he wants you to punch him

7 soat oldin
Loy71
Loy71

You could use a different interpretation. Minds don't collapse superpositions but navigate through propabilities by changing focus (on multiverses). It's not about materializing something out of nothing as some clowns suggest but push propabilities by action. What we all do all the time btw.

8 soat oldin
Lisa Rand
Lisa Rand

Bravo! Excellent! Beautiful! Finally they get it!

9 soat oldin
Varsys
Varsys

The Three Body Problem is a book from Liu Cixin that i recommend

9 soat oldin
Quentin Potter
Quentin Potter

It takes someone and something to make something else ! Same as it takes something to move something else ! that's why sciencetice get alot of things wrong!

9 soat oldin
Quentin Potter
Quentin Potter

It's not dark energy controlling space it's god controlling space !

9 soat oldin
Michael Brownlee
Michael Brownlee

Use these axioms, triggered.

9 soat oldin
Michael Brownlee
Michael Brownlee

Cowabunga dude, inhale hold exhale.

9 soat oldin
selforganisation
selforganisation

Does this argument require to assume absolute time (as is the case with the time-dependent Schrödinger equation shown) or does it work with special relativity?

9 soat oldin
jharris947
jharris947

Sorry, could you repeat that.

9 soat oldin
Charles Mouse
Charles Mouse

Thanks for another most enlightening episode. So... That explanation makes sense given I'm only an interested amateur and the explanation was very likely a gross simplification for the sake of people like me. With that in mind I may be making a fallacious observation but here goes: I see how 'many worlds' could fit this idea but doesn't it actually point to there not being 'many worlds'? Following this logic, but for the options that don't make it to my 'personal consciousness', it seems to me these 'other paths' become self-pruning... ...you might, theoretically, measure an alternate 'world line' if it's close enough to you but the 'further away' it gets the 'less real' it becomes. Rather than 'many worlds' as the options all branch off this looks to me more like one world with increasingly fuzzy 'fuzz' around it - another 'grand wave function' made of all the 'smaller wave functions' where 'our world' exists at the point of 'maximal constructive interference'. I hope I'm making sense and my point isn't lost in my poorly worded attempt at making it. So, does this 'smell' right? ... On a more 'spooky' subject does this go some way to explain the observation that novel things start out very hard but seem to become progressively easier with repetition, even when those doing the repeating are not in contact? eg: new compounds are often hellishly difficult to synthesize but as more labs give the same process a go it seems to get progressively easier, even though the method used is the same and the people concerned are all equally unfamiliar with the process? Is this an artifact of us all existing within the same 'grand wave function' and our similar actions 'constructively interfere' with each other so making what was once unlikely increasingly likely?

10 soat oldin
GoldenTreesYT Minecrafter
GoldenTreesYT Minecrafter

T e c h n o M o n k e y

10 soat oldin
Paul Marostica
Paul Marostica

So, in the last video I watched by PBS Space Time, among other things, you assumed 1 field exists everywhere in space for each kind of elementary particle, and a fluctuation in a position in space can make any of those particles appear in that position. And in this video you are assuming only 1 electron might exist? Is it possible your physicists need lessons on how to distinguish between ridiculously physically illogical assumptions and rigorously physically logical 1s, so you can avoid the embarrassing self-contradicting make believe? My unifying fundamental physics theory, matter theory, explains 23 fundamental physics observables the standard model can not explain. Matter theory will easily replace all 6 current professionally used fundamental physics theories. And using matter theory, you will understand exactly what is physically illogical in each of those 6 theories. History will remember physicists of this era as being in 1 out of 2 groups: those in the last generation of physicists clinging to 6 contradicting fundamental theories, most of which are ridiculously physically illogical, and those in the 1st generation of physicists using only 1 necessary and sufficient rigorously physically and mathematically logical unifying theory, matter theory. Which group do your physicists want to be in? I am seeking funding, and I am offering a monetary reward to the person who 1st introduces me to my eventual funder. Search keywords: matter theory marostica.

10 soat oldin
John King
John King

'Nothing' became an infinite 'something'? This 'something' came with infinite energy? I dont buy it.

10 soat oldin
Jitendra Kumar
Jitendra Kumar

REALITY EXIST when we made.

10 soat oldin
Carl O
Carl O

I replied this to a commentator below, but then thought I would make it a comment to the video also, in case someone would reply to it?: "What an outside observer sees, is not real. He can just not see what happens at or below the event horizon.. He has to go inside the black hole to see what really happens when crossing the event horizon.. So everything they observe about black holes are just illusions. Nothing is really frozen on the horizon. The mass is not lying only spread around on the horizon. It is gone inside, but just existing beyond our view. So everything passing into the black hole is really just transformed into a differentiated layered mass of lighter and lighter elements from the center to the surface of solid matte,r and then liquids, and then gases forming the "atmosphere" above the solids/liquids. All electromagnetic waves (photons) will be blue shifted into smaller and smaller wavelengths until they are transformed into physical matter, but in one zone for example microwaves coming from the outside will be visible lights there, while in a zone lower down in the atmosphere radio waves from the outside will become visible light there. So, when they say the outside universe will disappear from sight on the inside, it is a lie, because it is what was visible light on the outside, becoming blue shifted, that is invisible to the eye only. Other lower frequencies on the outside will of course also be blue shifted and the become visible lights. Therefore I imagine that the world inside the black hole may even look like the Earth with an iron core and a center consisting of elementary particles and the point of singularity. The surface consists of lighter silicate matter, and upon that water and then an atmosphere. The sky could be the event horizon possibly for example. May be the Earth is part of a zoned black hole, the frozen event horizon becoming like a magnifying lense, through which we see the whole universe. However, what we see of the outside, is the low frequency part of of what the Universe sends to us. Thus we see only the low frequency part of the planets surrounding us ande we becoming the original sun which these planets had. It is fun to speculate about something that never anyone can check out. We may make our own truths and no one can dismiss it. Nice. ------ Btw. if we had been living in a black hole, it would mean we observe timing of events in the universe passing much faster than it actually does. And the age of the universe would in reality then be younger than we calculate it to be. A time fastening of 1000 times would make the universe only 13 million years old for example, and distances only a thousandth of what they seems like to us. Our Earth also, which age we calculate using a timing calibrated according to the outside stars and Sun would only be 4.5 million years old. So there could be a lot of delusions we are fed here."

10 soat oldin
John King
John King

Nothing seems to exist somewhere! This somewhere then 'evolves'. Not buying it.

10 soat oldin
6 6
6 6

You said hole. Uh huh huh huh.

10 soat oldin
Stuart Round
Stuart Round

What if (this always means something stupid to follow), what if we could travel back in time at the same rate we travelled forward in space, meaning we arrived at the destination instantaneously?

11 soat oldin
Covert Messiah
Covert Messiah

It is ZERO probability. There is a point where mathematics simply becomes silly. The infinite monkey idea is just something a stupid hairless monkey would come up with. Just an opinion from another stupid hairless monkey...

11 soat oldin
James Brooks
James Brooks

Please note; the changes you describe happen over thousands of years, man-made global heating is rapidly changing on a timescale of decades; we don't have time to obfuscate, delay and obstruct what atmospheric, oceanographic, geological, biological, chemical and physical scientists have been telling us for decades.

11 soat oldin
pobinr
pobinr

Deep question. What distinguishes an event from an observation ? As I understand it, Copenhagen would have us believe events aren't real/determined until observed. Or am I mistaken. But if not then imagine if one observed to see where a photon lands in the double slit experiment via a very indirect means/imaging chain. Or if you wait a day to view a photo of the screen. Surely the wave function has already collapsed a day before & is not dependent on the observer? What about indirect observations of the universe which most are. What about looking at a galaxy a billion light years away. Surely we don't change the way it looks by observing it ! The few photons that hit our eyes are the result of trillions off previous wave function collapses that led to their emission. Surely we didn't make all those previous events happen by observing the photons that hit our eyes or detector !

11 soat oldin
Palmer Eldritch
Palmer Eldritch

Wow... Peter Dinklage got super tall and really smart all of a sudden ! Cool !!

11 soat oldin
carl johnson
carl johnson

Well, if we accept that the mind is part of the quantum field, then it makes sense, we are privy to quantum wave exchanges or Information. So as we think, using our minds and not just the neurons in our heads, we can affect quantum pairs and cause a wave exchange. The pathway to the mind is Conscience which is created when both halves of our brain work in tandem therefore creating consciousness. This spooky action must affect the quantum field and probably is necessary for the continuation of existence itself if we look at the big picture. The big mystical question is, are we affecting the quantum in cooperation with the laws that govern the quantum, therefore, reflecting the image of how one is expected to exist or 180 degrees opposed. The last question for us to ponder: Are We the Image or it's reflection...

11 soat oldin
The Corner Case Man
The Corner Case Man

If this is a simulation, then I wish whoever built my character didn't take all the mental illness disadvantages at character creation.

12 soat oldin
Jyaan : God given.
Jyaan : God given.

Everything came into order to make existence from no order which is only possible under the supervision of a controller. Order does not come on its own according to our daily experience. Not a single evidence for it in the history of humanity. So, it is much sensible and fair to assume that this universe has been made by some existing personality.

12 soat oldin
Mademe Dothis
Mademe Dothis

Wait, hold on. I've seen people demonstrate interference patterns in way messier conditions than described here. Shouldn't any medium instantly cause decoherence then? As in, any amount of air, fiberoptic cable, conducting material or anything else? This makes it sound like coherence is extremely frail, but also like you could still make a measurement, if it was subtle enough and didn't mess too much with the wave function. I mean, the impression I had is that any measurement at all would cause the collapse instantly, but this makes it seem like if you managed to make one of the two paths of the photon leave a small enough trace that the wave only got impacted a tiny bit you could not only get away with a measurement, but then come collect its results way later. I mean, there are a ton of particles showing up in the video's explanation. How small do you need to make your storage device to still be able to measure the event without causing decoherence? If you had an observer that was one particle-sized and a storage device that was one particle-sized would they be able to measure the path of the photon without messing with coherence? If this is an emergent thing from our brains being big, how small a brain would be able to bypass this?

12 soat oldin
Benevolent Protector
Benevolent Protector

Its the natural Precession of the Equinoxes. 💫

12 soat oldin
healer81
healer81

Interesting to listen to but Wooo WOoooo to me. How does knowing this make my life better?

13 soat oldin
RoiF
RoiF

I listened to Jordan Maxwell's - Alien Interventions in Human Civilizations and it gets more interesting.

13 soat oldin
J Decker
J Decker

So I was just pondering this; for the big bang, and expansion, who's to say we're anywhere near the origin of where the big bang happened? Wouldn't the very distant sub-areas of an explosion locally look like everything is spreading apart pretty evenly in all directions? even if there is also stretching of space, how do you filter that? do we really have enough sense of self-velocity that we can know how fast everything is receding? I guess; red shift is instantaneously measurable...

13 soat oldin
elave16
elave16

The like sistem is unfair with deep and extremely interesting videos. I get so hung up with the video that I seldom remember to like!

13 soat oldin
Joe Johnson
Joe Johnson

I am pretty sure I've encountered aliens on the streets of New York after 2AM, or were they human pretending to be aliens, I can't remember. Could be that I am the alien, if so, I find nothing interesting about you earth people and I've sent a cable home telling them there's no life here.

14 soat oldin
The Wizard
The Wizard

Regarding 0-Point Energy: It seems to me if the powers-that-be could put a meter on it and charge for it they would provide such energy world-wide! Heck, it would be FREE for them selling it so they would make a remarkable profit! A much bigger profit margin, yet... … why don’t they do this? The answer is simple if you ponder what the reason could be. There is only one plausible explanation: 0-Point/Free Energy is easily accessible to everyone. Anyone. We can make it ourselves at home. It seems to me if the powers-that-be could put a meter on it and charge for it they would provide such energy world-wide! Heck, it would be FREE for them and they could change money for it! A much bigger profit margin. However, so, why don’t they do this? The answer is simple. 0-Point/Free Energy is easily accessible to everyone. Anyone and everyone! So, they must depend on keeping it secret! For example, I believe it’s possible that the planet’s atmosphere is supercharged with electricity and magnetic currents. I believe Nichola Tesla discovered the globe is a giant electrical motor, with two opposite magnetic poles, and it spins which creates electricity. Science shows about 100 lightning bolts strike the Earth's surface every second of every day 365 days a year. That's about 8 million per day and 3 billion each year. Sounds like our atmosphere is supercharged with electricity to me.

14 soat oldin
Michael Horning
Michael Horning

How come none of my mass ever goes missing?

14 soat oldin
Handlebar Fox
Handlebar Fox

this is like defining a string's vibration by adding up all the possible modes of vibration

14 soat oldin
Wade Sahni
Wade Sahni

I appreciate that this guy is very smart and understands this thoroughly, however, he explains it with such speed, and using jargon that 95% of the planet is not familiar with, and so the result is zero comprehension on the part of the viewer. Every video on this content is either a mad scientist rushing through an explanation (why they are rushing I'm not sure, if someone has taken the time to search out this content they are probably patient enough to learn it properly) using language no one knows, or so simplified as to be meaningless. Inserting a reference such as "that's the feeling you have when on a train" is useful, but without reference back to the principle you are trying to explain it does not give the viewer the connection needed to build on your lesson elements. Hope that helps.

14 soat oldin
-
-

10:52 - It may not be possible to adjust the setup to make the double-slit experiment (with an observer) reset to an interference pattern, but wouldn't it be possible to get it just by chance from the setup just happening to be correct? Logically, with enough experiments, eventually you should get a result that counters the current notion that an observation will collapse it to a single point. 🤔

15 soat oldin
דב מרקו
דב מרקו

To make time travel possible, both relativity theory and quantum mechanics are needed

15 soat oldin
Bob Smith
Bob Smith

One explanation of Fermi Paradox is that our next step in evolution is more in line with a Pauline transformation to divine immortality, which jumps the shark, as it were. Thus making high-tech obsolete or meaningless. All sentient beings in the universe may be on this same evolutionary track. See Asimov's "The Gods Themselves."

15 soat oldin
MrDirectoatimiamigo
MrDirectoatimiamigo

The universe told to light: If you ever ask anything to me, I will never lie...and I never tell the truth, not even now. This guy is the universe

15 soat oldin
Nathan Moore
Nathan Moore

Easy! Vape around 100mg of DMT hehe... But seriously.

15 soat oldin
rexinkognito
rexinkognito

but DNA is not made of amino acids but desoxyribose, phosphate and nucleobases

15 soat oldin
Vincent Bielawa
Vincent Bielawa

We haven't managed to get off the earth yet, apart from the moon landing and the space station. We've also had 6 near life ending situations. Also considering how far it would be to get to another habitable planet, and actually surviving there. I'm sure there is life in the galaxy apart from us, I just don't think it's an easy thing to stroll around saying hello.

15 soat oldin
Michael Calarco
Michael Calarco

So it’s chaos theory! The decoherence is from a adding an addition variable that makes it unpredictable initial conditions..... so it’s stable but unknowable right. the visuals was a great way to think of this.

15 soat oldin
teru karoy
teru karoy

i didnt understand a damn thing but somehow i am sure it still theoretical science

16 soat oldin
Daniel Pasko
Daniel Pasko

He says clockwise spin but the graphic is spinning counter clockwise, we must be in an upside down and inside out parity universe!

16 soat oldin
Electroillusion
Electroillusion

A trip through outer space ... uzmemory.info/video/aNnKzZSZt3XcbaI/video.html

16 soat oldin
AxeCrazyOrc
AxeCrazyOrc

Idk why i keep watching these kinds of videos they always give me an miniature existential crisis

16 soat oldin
fluffymcdeath
fluffymcdeath

No matter how you solve for the cat, Copenhagen, many worlds, omniversal wave function, it's got interesting implications for longevity and loss. Of course, I could also be talking crap. uzmemory.info/video/YpSWy3_YqYKvoro/video.html

17 soat oldin
Gabe Heller
Gabe Heller

My understanding (may be wrong) is that trebuchets were generally constructed and fired on wheels. As the weight moves away from the castle, the trebuchet rolls towards the castle further increasing the energy of the projectile as it is released, effectively stealing more energy from the counterweight than just its change in height would indicate. Is this right? If so, would this change the answer?

17 soat oldin
Ryan Marks
Ryan Marks

How does the decoherence hypothesis explain that fact that an interference pattern appears in the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment and quantum eraser experiments in general?

17 soat oldin
Louis Richards
Louis Richards

One and only one infinite universe

18 soat oldin
Fuckgoogle Googlesucks
Fuckgoogle Googlesucks

what's this mesmerizing accent? I had to turn on subtitle

18 soat oldin
Brent Jacobs
Brent Jacobs

Also does this mean the double slit experiment should look different in a vacuum??

18 soat oldin
Brent Jacobs
Brent Jacobs

Oh it all makes sense now! Decoherence/wave function collapse is really just our inability to take into account all the factors rather than an actual physical phenomenon.

19 soat oldin
Brent Jacobs
Brent Jacobs

I don't understand why the concept of multiple histories is constantly brought up. If a photon is just a propogating wave through a couple of fields, then surely it can only have one history regardless of where it ends up. If it has multiple histories then surely that suggests it's not really a wave because there would have to be multiple separate waves with with their own distinct histories. This isn't adding up!

19 soat oldin
Clipper Stwawberry
Clipper Stwawberry

When boundary expands, what asymmetry really exists?!

19 soat oldin
DragonCall
DragonCall

If time is infinite, does that mean every single event possible will happen and already has happened an infinite amount of times?

20 soat oldin